Understanding-informed Bias Mitigation for Fair CMR Segmentation
Tiarna Lee1
, Esther Puyol-Anton1,2
, Bram Ruijsink1,3, Pier-Giorgio Masci1
, Louise Keehn4, Phil Chowienczyk4
, Emily Haseler4
, Miaojing Shi5
, Andrew King1
1: School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, 2: HeartFlow Inc, United States, 3: Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, 4: British Heart Foundation Centre, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, King’s College London, 5: College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University
Publication date: 2025/12/30
https://doi.org/10.59275/j.melba.2025-6747
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used for medical imaging tasks. However, there can be biases in AI models, particularly when they are trained using imbalanced training datasets. One such example has been the strong ethnicity bias effect in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) image segmentation models. Although this phenomenon has been reported in a number of publications, little is known about the effectiveness of bias mitigation algorithms in this domain. We aim to investigate the impact of common bias mitigation methods to address bias between Black and White subjects in AI-based CMR segmentation models. Specifically, we use oversampling, importance reweighing and Group DRO as well as combinations of these techniques to mitigate the ethnicity bias. Second, motivated by recent findings on the root causes of AI-based CMR segmentation bias, we evaluate the same methods using models trained and evaluated on cropped CMR images. We find that bias can be mitigated using oversampling, significantly improving performance for the underrepresented Black subjects whilst not significantly reducing the majority White subjects’ performance. Using cropped images increases performance for both ethnicities and reduces the bias, whilst adding oversampling as a bias mitigation technique with cropped images reduces the bias further. When testing the models on an external clinical validation set, we find high segmentation performance and no statistically significant bias.
Keywords
Machine Learning · Bias Mitigation
Bibtex
@article{melba:2025:036:lee,
title = "Understanding-informed Bias Mitigation for Fair CMR Segmentation",
author = "Lee, Tiarna and Puyol-Anton, Esther and Ruijsink, Bram and Masci, Pier-Giorgio and Keehn, Louise and Chowienczyk, Phil and Haseler, Emily and Shi, Miaojing and King, Andrew",
journal = "Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging",
volume = "3",
issue = "Special issue on FAIMI",
year = "2025",
pages = "808--824",
issn = "2766-905X",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.59275/j.melba.2025-6747",
url = "https://melba-journal.org/2025:036"
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Lee, Tiarna
AU - Puyol-Anton, Esther
AU - Ruijsink, Bram
AU - Masci, Pier-Giorgio
AU - Keehn, Louise
AU - Chowienczyk, Phil
AU - Haseler, Emily
AU - Shi, Miaojing
AU - King, Andrew
PY - 2025
TI - Understanding-informed Bias Mitigation for Fair CMR Segmentation
T2 - Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging
VL - 3
IS - Special issue on FAIMI
SP - 808
EP - 824
SN - 2766-905X
DO - https://doi.org/10.59275/j.melba.2025-6747
UR - https://melba-journal.org/2025:036
ER -